Tribunal Dismisses 16-Year Torture Claim Over Lack of Evidence in Jinja

Jinja City – The Uganda Human Rights Commission tribunal on Tuesday sat at its regional offices in Jinja City to handle nine case files related to allegations of torture and violations of personal liberty. However, one of the longest-running cases on the list—filed in 2009 by a man who claimed to have been tortured by security personnel—came to a close with a dismissal.

Peter Andevu, who has for 16 years sought justice for what he describes as torture at the hands of operatives of the Violent Crime Crack Unit (VCCU), had his complaint dismissed after the tribunal ruled that he failed to present witnesses or sufficient evidence to support his claims.

According to the tribunal chairperson, Ms. Mariam Wangadya, Andevu’s case lacked credibility.

“He used a lot of lies and was inconsistent in his statements. Each time he came here, he appeared well-off and carried a heavy wallet,” Wangadya said. “He did not produce any witnesses who could corroborate his story. Therefore, the case has been dismissed with costs.”

However, Andevu insists that he has been seeking justice for genuine suffering. He claims that men in uniform arrested and tortured him, leaving him physically and emotionally scarred.

Speaking after the ruling, Andevu expressed deep disappointment.

“I came here because I believed this commission stands for justice. I was tortured. I suffered. Sixteen years is a long time to wait for justice, only to be dismissed like this,” he said emotionally.

The tribunal continues to hear several other cases filed by citizens who allege unlawful detention, torture, and harassment by state agents. The Uganda Human Rights Commission maintains that every complainant is given an opportunity to be heard but emphasized the need for evidence and consistency.

As the session proceeded, human rights activists and residents in attendance called for improved access to legal support for victims—many of whom they say lack the means to gather evidence or secure representation in such cases.

For Andevu, the ruling marks a painful chapter, though he says he is not giving up.

“I will look for another way. The truth is still the truth,” he said, slowly walking out of the tribunal rooms.